X

Connect (X)

Tag Archives: PCIA The Wireless Infrastructure Association

Q and A with Jonathan Adelstein

IoTs, HetNets and the Transformation to Come

The head of PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association sat down AGL Media Group Senior Editor Ernest Worthman at the HetNet Expo 2015 in October in Houston

Worthman: As with any emerging technology, different people define the Internet of Things (IoT) differently. Tell me what is your definition, your view, of the IoT?

Adelstein: Today, we had some discussion around that, at the conference, actually. To me, it’s about the connectivity of devices that really aren’t human-to-device, or human-to-human. It’s basically the next level of machine-to-machine (M2M). There are so many connections emerging, already. Connected cars, for example. Today, at the conference, we learned that AT&T has already connected 1 million cars.

I had no idea there are that many connected cars out there; and that is just one carrier. And, that’s expected to grow to the tens of millions shortly. I’ve got a connected car myself, and I found it remarkable because I can get Google maps after years of frustration with various navigation systems. Suddenly my car is able to connect to the internet directly. I’m benefitting so directly from the IoT by not getting lost, and by getting information to get rerouted if there’s a traffic problem. This is just the tip of the iceberg. It goes on and on to connected homes, smart cities, infrastructures, and more.

The IoT is transforming the way we live our lives. I think for the better. But it’s going to take a lot of bandwidth to make that possible.

Worthman: What role do you see HetNets playing in the IoT?

Adelstein: Well, the IoT is going to require so many more connections, of which, a vast number of them are going to ride over various wireless platforms. Some of them will be cellular network platforms, some will be Wi-Fi, some will be dedicated spectrum and dedicated networks. All of them are going to require infrastructure of some sort and backhaul to the network as well, in most cases.

Extrapolating that, we are going to be in a boom business at some point, given the size of this market which is predicted to be up to, if one believes the forecasts, 50 billion devices by 2025. And there are estimates that range from 25 to 75 billion, as well. That’s how much we don’t know about how many devices there’s going to be, and how vast it could be. But none of the estimates are for a low number.

Existing networks are already getting strained by rapid growth in data demand, so there is a lot of traction for getting new networks, such as HetNets, up and running. While the new networks that have to be setup in the past few years are using bands that might be underutilized now, but in a few years, they’ll be filled up with data as well, and there will be a need to identify more spectrum for streaming hi-def, real-time video, over-the-top services, big data and other data services.

All of this bodes well for our industry. It’s just a matter of time, in terms of the HetNets, until is it really going to take off. And, of course, the explosion is always just around the corner. I don’t know when that corner will turn, but HetNets are going to be essential because a lot of this will not go over the macro network. Some will go to the macro network and some will go over smaller cells, but the very nature of it lends itself to smaller wireless facilities and antenna systems.

Worthman: Give me your definition of HetNet. Tell me what you think it looks like or is going to look like in the next few years.

Adelstein: The HetNet involves every antenna system working together from the macro to the small cell, to the DAS, to the picocell and to the femtocell. They all really interact. We often think of HetNet as being anything that’s not nailed to a tower. But in fact, the HetNet does include tower-based communications and works seamlessly with it, ideally. If it doesn’t work seamlessly with it, then there’s a problem that can happen because trying to coordinate so many different antennas and making sure they don’t cause harmful interference is a monumental task. Because as the network densifies further and further, the smaller antenna systems that aren’t nailed to a tower are really what people think of as the HetNet.

So, the HetNet really represents getting the antennas closer to the end-user as the network gets denser. However, that creates more opportunities for harmful interference, and an elevated need for coordination, because everything has to work together seamlessly. There are a lot of technical challenges involved, a lot of challenges in how you deal with spectrum, and how you get adequate spectrum to meet the growing demand. You get more throughput by densifying; you get more throughput through spectrum; and you get more throughput through technologies that create better spectral efficiency.

Here at PCIA, our focus has been on densification. Although we do try to make sure that there’s adequate spectrum in order for our systems to have reached their full potential.

Worthman: Is the HetNet going to be one big network throughout the globe, or is it going to be a number of different disparate networks that come together to form, for lack of a better term, a cloud of interconnect?

Adelstein: I think it’s a number of disparate wireless systems that may or may not interact. Each community might have its own HetNet. I don’t think it’s one global HetNet. I think of it usually as serving individual communities, or individual devices in the case of IoT. So, it could be a completely different system in one city, or one part of one city, than in another. It really depends on what the particular carriers needs are, how the deployments are placed, and what the historical patterns of the deployments are.

So, you’re going to see a whole array of different solutions that deal with the particular problems of that particular community, as well as solutions that have evolved over time, based on the technology that was available. Eventually, I do think, they will become more and more consistent, however.

We are really in the early stage of the industry, where people are trying to find out what the best solutions are, and there is an array of them. We see so many different great technologies here at the HetNet Expo at the exhibit hall which has been packed with people that are interested in finding out what the latest technologies are, and how they work, and comparing them.

In the old days, the only way to do that was to come to a trade show and look at the different booths. Now, of course, we have the Internet. But still, we find that the traffic on the floor has been really dense because people are still trying to figure this out. I don’t think there’s been a one-size-fits-all solution yet, and that’s why you see so many contrasting versions of the HetNet in different communities.

Worthman: How do you think HetNets will change the wireless landscape in terms of developing technology?

Adelstein: Well, HetNets really are the future. The need for more bandwidth is driving everything. And the necessity to, basically, shrink the antenna size, and get closer to the end-user, is going to be paramount in meeting the level of demand. And, the IoT, on top of it, is creating an incredible demand on these networks. That is going to drive newer and more advanced technologies that are become more and more efficient.

Of course, the HetNets evolved with the broader generations from 3G to 4G to 5G. But even within those different generations of wireless technology, there is an array of particular antenna systems, in backhaul and fronthaul systems, that are being experimented with and developed. There is no real time frame as to exactly where it’s going to go, but it just keeps getting better and better in dealing with some of the problems that we see in the field. Then there are the self-optimizing networks and software-defined networks with smarter and smarter antennas that can be adjusted, sometimes remotely, sometimes not. But the point is that they are better in communicating with each other, so that they know how to avoid causing harmful interference.

But, even with all of this next-generation technology, there are still huge challenges left. You have different carriers; you have Wi-Fi; you have other types of devices, with other wireless technologies that are being put on the network, all of which can interfere with one another.

So, having these smart networks is essential as we get to a more congested spectrum environment. The lord is not making any more spectrum, so we better do more with what we were given. The way to do that is to re-use these frequencies as often as possible. But there are physical limits on how far you can go without these systems basically bumping into one another. I also believe the software element it is going to continue to evolve along with the hardware to deal with the complexity.

It’s going to require a trained workforce, as well. We’re thinking ahead about this because just there aren’t enough people right now to deal with this in the field. Thinking about it in your own home. How often your own Wi-Fi system goes out? Imagine having a Wi-Fi system on steroids, with four different carriers, in some building, somewhere. Who’s going to adjust it? Who’s going to maintain it? Who’s going to install it in the first place? If they don’t install it right, someone has got to come back. There’s going to be more and more demand on the workforce. We’d better make sure we have these people trained on how to do it, and do it right the first time.

Worthman: What is your vision of the IoT, 5G

Adelstein: Every aspect of our lives is going to be available wirelessly, whether it’s driving, keeping in touch with our family and our friends, dealing with our homes or connecting to our work. Everywhere we go, we’re going to be, basically, in touch with this web of both people and material things in a way that can’t imagine today.

I don’t think I could’ve imagined 4G when I was growing up. That I can walk anywhere and watch video. And get any crazy question I have answered about the type of flowers I just came across, or what is that particular noise? Imagine when you can connect with your home, your car, your work on such a deep level of communication instantaneously, it will really transform the way we live our lives, and make it more efficient. We won’t waste nearly as much time, hopefully We’ll have access to healthcare solutions that are unparalleled, with constant monitoring, and the availability of professionals anywhere, as well as the ability to monitor various health statistics, and health metrics.

I think the human family, hopefully, will grow closer, as a result of this, because we’ll be so interconnected. Of course, there’s always the possibility of technology breaking us apart too. It’s not always a good thing but I think in the end, we’ll find ways to make it lift up humanity, and lead to more economic productivity, better education opportunities, better healthcare, better public safety and improve any number of things.

The possibilities are really limitless. I think as people find them, and there’s more and more applications it’s just going to develop on its own into a vast eco-system that will transform the world, and it begins with that.

 

Industry Remembers Life of Jay Kitchen

By J. Sharpe Smith

December 17, 2015 — Emmett B. Kitchen Jr. (Jay), 70, died this week in his Palm Island, Florida, home after an extended battle with Parkinson’s disease.

Jay was president and CEO of the Personal Communications Industry Association (PCIA) from 1994 to 2004. Before that he was CEO of the National Association of Business and Educational Radio (NABER), which merged with PCIA in 1994. Jay graduated from Virginia Technological University with a degree in Electrical Engineering and began his career in the public sector at the FCC where he served as a wireless telecom policy adviser.

Jonathan Adelstein, president and CEO of PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association, paid tribute to Jay, saying that he played an “instrumental role in shaping the modern voice of the wireless industry in Washington.”

“Under his watch, PCIA established itself as a leading organization representing companies that build, operate and own the nation’s vital wireless infrastructure,” Adelstein said. “His tireless work and dedication to this association and the entire wireless sector deserves the utmost respect and appreciation.”

Mark E. Crosby, president of the Enterprise Wireless Alliance, competed with Jay during his tenure at the NABER and then at PCIA for frequency coordination business.

“We were fierce competitors but at the same time very good friends. I will miss Jay,” Crosby said. “More often than not, we worked together on the critical issues that the land mobile radio community faced.”

Wireless consultant and researcher Andrew Seybold tweeted that Jay was “a true leader in the world of land mobile radio and wireless. He will be missed!”

Jay was very helpful to members of the press, always taking calls and making time to explain his association’s positions. Don Bishop, executive editor and associate publisher of AGL magazine, described Jay’s leadership style as “calm, competent and reflective.”
“When NABER merged with PCIA, Jay took charge of a large number of membership sections,” Bishop said. “I was very impressed with his organizational ability.”

I was a reporter who was new to Washington, D.C., and new to the wireless industry in 1989 when I met Jay. He became one of my first sources. I experienced him as a warm, caring individual who would always take time to teach me about radio, the industry and FCC regulation. His self-deprecating humor always made me feel at ease and he became a true friend.

A good association head is equal parts politician, impresario, visionary, manager and ambassador for the industry. As for myself, I can attest that Jay made me want to be a part of the wireless industry community, and 26 years later I am still grateful.

California Governor Signs Bill Streamlining Siting

By J. Sharpe Smith

October 14, 2015 — California Gov. Jerry Brown has signed legislation streamlining the siting process for applicants, which provides a deemed approved remedy if the city or county fails to act on an application within the FCC prescribed application timelines.

California Assembly Bill 57 will reduce delays in applications to site new wireless facilities and renew permits for existing facilities, according to Jonathan Adelstein, PCIA’s president and CEO.

“By speeding approval of these facilities, we can ensure Californians have timely access to robust mobile broadband,” added Adelstein.

There was one exception for wireless deployments on fire department properties built into AB 57, which are not subject to the automatic deemed-approved remedy.

Jonathan Kramer, Telecom Law Firm, does not expect a lot to change with the law’s passage, because he believes the majority of wireless projects in California are already approved or denied within the FCC shot clock time frames.

“One of the biggest impediments to quicker processing of wireless projects by local governments has been the game of musical chairs played by the carriers and turf vendors who seem to frequently switch out permit runners mid-project,” he said.

Another prediction from the municipality side has been the belief that local governments will just end-up denying projects that legitimately require more time to process when the applicant refuses to enter into a tolling agreement.

Wireless Deployment Regs Entering State Law — PCIA

VB_pic_compressed

Bloys

Iowa Governor Terry Branstad signed into law a bill aimed at speeding the deployment of wireless infrastructure on June 23. It was the second such bill in as many months with the passage of the Indiana Wireless Telecommunications Investment Act on May 27. (see our story) We asked Van Bloys, government affairs Counsel, PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association, to explain the significance of this legislation and provide some perspective.

AGL Link: What key aspects do these bills have in common?  

Bloys: Both the Indiana and Iowa bills:

  • Limit the materials required for an applicant to turn over with an application. For instance, both prohibit local requirements that an applicant turn over information relating to an applicant’s proprietary business decisions.
  • Improve access to public rights-of-way and/or utility poles, where many providers are deploying small wireless facilities.
  • Provide time limits for approval or denial of applications, based on facility type, to promote predictability for both industry and local government.
  • Require fees to be cost-based to improve accountability.

AGL Link: Are these bills related to federal legislation (Section 6409)?

Bloys: Some aspects of these bills codify the FCC’s rules implementing Section 6409(a). In that way, they relate both to federal legislation as well as the federal regulations implementing that legislation.

AGL Link: What other states have drafted this type of legislation or are these the first?

Bloys: Since the passage of Section 6409(a), many states have codified aspects of the federal statute (see list below). However, since the FCC’s final rules were published in the October 2014 Acceleration of Broadband Deployment Report and Order, these are the first state statutes codifying aspects of the FCC’s final rules implementing Section 6409(a).

AGL Link: Are these bills taking FCC regulation and turning it into state law?

Bloys: In short, yes.

Two bills in the 2014 session (Colorado HB 1327 and Washington HB 2175) codified one aspect of the FCC’s 2014 Acceleration of Broadband Deployment Report and Order. These two states adopted the PCIA-developed, technology-neutral, volume-based definition for small wireless facilities that the FCC also adopted with respect to small wireless facility regulatory relief under Section 106 of the NHPA. The Indiana bill also adopts this definition.

Moreover, the Indiana and Iowa bills both codify timeframes first set forth by the FCC in the 2009 Shot Clock Declaratory Ruling. Other states that have done so in recent years include:

Missouri SB 650 (2014)

Colorado HB 1327 (2014)

Georgia HB 176 (2014)

Wisconsin AB 40 (2013)

New Hampshire SB 101 (2013)

North Carolina HB 664 (2013)

Michigan SB 1064 (2013)

Pennsylvania SB 1345 (2012)

Wireless Veteran “Tam” Murray to Chair PCIA

May 1, 2015, Alexandria, VA – The Board of Directors of PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association this week elected new officers during PCIA’s Wireless Infrastructure Show in Hollywood, Florida.

Wireless infrastructure industry veteran Thomas “Tam” Murray, the Founder & Managing Member of Community Wireless Structures, is the new PCIA Board Chairman; Steven Marshall, the Executive Vice President & President of the U.S. Tower Division of American Tower, is the new Vice Chairman & Secretary; and David Weisman, the President & Chief Executive Officer of Insite Wireless Group, is the new Treasurer.

“As evidenced by the attendance and enthusiasm at our annual show this week, the wireless infrastructure industry continues to grow rapidly to meet the burgeoning consumer demand for data,” said PCIA President and CEO Jonathan Adelstein. “PCIA is honored that these immensely successful executives will serve our association to help the industry sustain and diversify that growth.”

Also serving with Murray, Marshall, and Weisman on the previously elected PCIA Board of Directors are:

W. Benjamin Moreland, President & Chief Executive Officer of Crown Castle International who just completed his tenure as Board Chairman; Richard J. Byrne, Founder & Chief Executive Officer of TowerCo, LLC; Marc Ganzi, Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer of Digital Bridge Holdings, LLC; Kathleen Ham, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, of T-Mobile US, Inc.; Vonya McCann, Senior Vice President, Government Affairs, of Sprint Nextel Corporation; Jeffrey A. Stoops, President & Chief Executive Officer of SBA Communications; and Adelstein.