If one wasn’t convinced that Verizon was serious about public safety before, seeing the carrier’s efforts at last week’s International Wireless Communications Expo held last week in Las Vegas would have sealed the deal. Sure, there have been signs, like when it aired a $5.3 million public safety ad on the Super Bowl, but at IWCE the carrier had the second largest booth on the show floor and Justin Blair, executive director – wireless business products, Verizon Wireless Business Products, served as a keynote speaker.
The first sign that Verizon was going to compete with FirstNet head on came back when the carrier turned on its virtual public safety core in March 2018, the same month AT&T’s FirstNet broadband network core went online.
As for Blair, his presentation did not disappoint. He started his keynote at the IWCE with a simple video showing a live demonstration of priority preemption on a Verizon network, which was nice and not accidentally set across the street from the World Trade Center in New York City, site of the terrorist attack that launched the movement that led to FirstNet. But he finished it off with a bang, talking about how Verizon was going to bring 5G to public safety. Verizon officially one-upped AT&T, which had committed to building out FirstNet as a 4G LTE network.
Blair challenged the audience to forget about current restrictions on data speeds and “think about the future of infrastructure,” where networks will support multi-gigabit speeds.
“How can you do your job better? 5G is going to allow you to do it faster,” Blair said. “On the 4G network, we have been able to achieve peak speeds 1.45 gigabits per second. That’s mind blowing, but a 5G network is going to allow those types of speeds all the time no matter how many radios are on the network, eventually 10 gigabits per second.”
Blair noted that multi-access edge computing is important so that first responders can process data on the edge of the network, instead of on mobile devices, where battery power is precious.
“You will be able to move the insights, not all the raw data, where it needs to go,” Blair said. “As you think about building a 5G network, it is important know that 5G is not just a new protocol, the one after 4G. 5G is an actual network experience. It is all about faster speeds and lower latency, but you can’t do that without software defined networking (SDN), network functions virtualization (NFV) and edge computing.”
SDN and NFV will allow agencies to quickly deploy services, such as mission critical push to talk. Patching a security breech also be accomplished more quickly. Blair encouraged the audience to explore how to get their applications into a virtualized environment at the edge of the 5G network.
“If you are not thinking about virtualization, you need to be,” Blair said. “Dream Big. Don’t think about the restrictions you have today with 4G or Wi-Fi. They will go away when we get to 5G.”
Verizon has several 5G labs, including a first responder lab in Washington, D.C., which is an incubator for local innovators to grow the 5G ecosystem. Running the lab is a company called ResponderXLabs, which was launched by Amazon Web Services Responder Corp in August 2018 to bring companies together to develop cutting-edge technology for first responders. The goal is to have 15 new technologies available this year.
“Together, we explore the boundaries of 5G network technology, co-create new applications and hardware, and rethink what’s possible in a 5G world,” according to the web site of ResponderXLabs.
Electronics 360 reports that five companies have been chosen by the lab so far, including Adcor Magnetic Systems for sensors and digital 3D environments; Blueforce Development for situational awareness; Kiana Analytics for real-time location, Qwake Technologies for augmented reality; and Aerial Applications for drones.
“Qwake Technology is doing something really, really cool,” Blair said. “We demonstrated their product, known as C-Thru, at the Mobile World Congress last week, and it allows a firefighter to see in a dark, smoke-filled room.”
I just got a feed about Qualcomm’s Tech Summit in Hawaii. As I read through it, I saw the remarks by Nicki Palmer, Verizon’s chief network engineering officer, about how great Verizon is.
This is the kind of grade-school banter that goes back and forth between carriers all the time. “I’m first, no I’m better, uh-uh mine works better than yours.” Does the industry really think that consumers care about these kind of statements? And are they supposed to intimidate each other?
I have been discussing this for a while now. In the December issue of Applied Wireless Technology,my column editorializes about the consumer’s excitement around 5G. There is some interesting data in support of that, in the column, so I believe it is worth a read.
My take in this editorial is that Palmer’s statements at the Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Tech Summit in Maui show just how egotistical individuals and organizations can be. “I have nothing else to say to the skeptics, she said. “You can catch up when you’re ready. By pushing this technology out as early as possible, there is a first mover advantage.” Really Verizon? You think you are all that and everybody else is just hanging laundry? Just because you say so does not make it so.
I am known for taking strong positions. I have been in this industry over 30 years, both as an engineer and an editor. I know many outstanding individuals, and companies, and have a deep respect for them. I also know any number of same, who are not quite so humble and professional. However, given the record of carriers doing all kinds of nefarious acts and “embellishing” (I am being kind here) on the truth, I find this kind of chest thumping extremely arrogant. This time it just happens to be Verizon.
Point-to-point/multipoint fixed wireless is a no-brainer. We have had this at mmWave frequencies for years – VSAT, E-band, W-band, etc. We have a deep well of understanding up to 100 GHz, even beyond. We all know that the first use cases for 5G will be fixed wireless. Marrying high-frequency mmWave to 5G mobile is where the rubber really meets the road. (Why do you think that much of the early mobile 5G action will be at existing frequencies and below 6 GHz?).
Now, all that aside, I think 5G fixed wireless is a great way to get early deployments of 5G out there and put some data in the experience bucket – maybe even generate RoI. To get 5G fixed wireless will simply mean upgrading or changing out existing hardware for 5G NR 3GPP hardware. The propagation models are known and there is plenty of bandwidth at these higher mmWave frequencies. So pounding on ones chest about 5G fixed wireless is, IMHO, much ado about nothing.
There is, of course, the entire NR network metrics. This is new territory in many areas. But given the understanding of mmWave, fixed wireless should be the perfect platform to integrate, tweak and hone our understanding of how 5G technologies will work in mmWave.
There will be a lot of fixed wireless 5G coming in the next year. And, there are plenty of use cases available for it. I feel it will start generating RoI pretty quickly after it is deployed.
However, as far as Verizon goes, if they really think they are the only ones with 5G fixed wireless, it will be interesting to watch them eat crow as everybody else does what they are doing.
We talk a lot about the 5G race with China, South Korea and Japan. But how are the U.S. carriers faring against each other? AT&T and Verizon threw down the gauntlet for next gen deployment right here in the United States during their third quarter earnings calls.
Verizon’s third quarter was highlighted by installations of its proprietary fixed 5G Home wireless service, and the continued enhancement of the fiber and small cells of its 4G LTE network. Verizon’s fixed wireless service successfully trods upon the turf of cablecos using millimeter wave spectrum to provide in-home Internet at wireline broadband speeds and capacity.
“The initial launch of 5G Home in four markets will lead to a larger rollout in 2019,” said Matthew Ellis, Verizon executive vice president and chief financial officer. “We are gaining valuable insights ahead of the industry that will drive refinements to the customer experience prior to the arrival of global standards-based equipment.”
While 5G is the buzz — the term was used 40 times according to the Seeking Alpha earnings call transcript while LTE was uttered twice — Verizon noted the importance of LTE to the near future. “Our 4G LTE network will continue to be a foundation of our services for many years to come,” Ellis said.
During the quarter, Verizon completed an end-to-end global standards compliant call with a smartphone test device using its network in Minneapolis. “We have said all along that we intend to be first not only in launching the world’s initial 5G commercial product but also the first to deliver true 5G mobility to consumers,” Ellis said.
Ellis said Verizon has been preparing its network for 5G through the deployment of fiber resources, small cells, spectrum and mobile edge computing capabilities. Year-to-date capital spending of $12.0 billion was up from $11.3 billion YTD last year. Capital expenditure for the full year is expected to be between $16.6 billion and $17.0 billion.
“As soon as devices and equipment are available the deployment of our 5G network on the global standard will begin for mobility and residential broadband in the new 5G ultra-wideband era,” Ellis said, “At Verizon, we believe that true 5G requires an ultra-wideband solution, utilizing millimeter wave spectrum to address the full array of use cases that 5G enables.”
In late October, Verizon committed $25 million to build a “technologically advanced wireless network” in the Florida Panhandle as it struggles to recover from Hurricane Michael. 5G technology will be a part of that infrastructure, and Panama City will become one of five announced Verizon 5G cities, joining Los Angeles, Houston, Indianapolis and Sacramento.
AT&T building on ‘our lead in 5G’
However, AT&T believes it has the lead in 5G, John M. Donovan, CEO AT&T Communications said during the carrier’s Q3 earnings call, and it will be introducing standards-based mobile 5G services in the next few weeks and in parts of a dozen cities by the end of the year. Additionally, the 5G mobile will be deployed in seven more cities in early 2019.
Donovan said the foundation has been put into place by 5G trials that were completed in several cities and the deployment of a fiber network, which will pass 14 million consumers and eight million businesses by mid-2019.
AT&T’s 5G Evolution will be in more than 400 markets by the end of the year with nationwide coverage by mid-2019 and theoretical peak speeds reaching 400 megabits per second. AT&T also plans to launch LTE Licensed Assisted Access in parts of 24 cities by the end of the year, which will be transitioned to 5G and can deliver faster speeds than LTE.
AT&T still plans to use a one-touch tower deployment solution, which combines FirstNet climbs to deploy Band 14 with other spectrum additions, 700 MHz, AWS-3, and WCS on radios that can be upgraded to 5G through a software change.
“We’re climbing towers and adding spectrum all at once. We’re also adding new radio capability, which will enable us to upgrade the tower to 5G, without another tower climb,” Donovan said. “Thanks in part to our FirstNet build, our fallow spectrum is being put into service at a rapid rate. We’re on track to increase the amount of spectrum deployed by nearly 50 percent. This is having a dramatic positive impact on our network.”
So who is leading the “race” to 5G? Joe Madden, Mobile Experts, said comparing AT&T and Verizon is a bit of an apples and oranges situation.
“Verizon is the first to deploy a high-capacity radio network, but the Verizon system does not use the 5G NR format. Instead, Verizon has chosen a proprietary format for fixed wireless access which is not compatible with 5G NR,” Madden said. “AT&T is deploying their first 5G commercial networks later than Verizon, but the AT&T network is compatible with 5G NR. “In my opinion, the AT&T approach is “ahead” of Verizon because they are in a better position to support mobile 5G with their network.
Last February, T-Mobile announced its plan to build out 5G in 30 cities nationwide using its 600 MHz and 28 GHz spectrum by the end of the year. The carrier followed with a multi-year, $3.5 billion contract with Nokia in July to deploy a nationwide network with end-to-end 3GPP 5G New Radio (NR) technology, software and services. In September, another contract was signed for 3GPP-compliant 5G NR equipment with Ericsson, also worth $3.5 billion.
“5G will be amazing, and we can’t even imagine all the cool stuff it will bring, just like with our earlier network innovations. That’s why truly mobile 5G has to be nationwide — period, the end,” said T-Mobile CEO John Legere.
T-Mobile expects to deploy 5G in its low-band 600 MHz spectrum across its existing nationwide macro network. “Nationwide Mobile 5G will require both high-band AND broad low-band coverage, and having unused nationwide 600 MHz spectrum means T-Mobile is in an ideal position to deliver,” T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray said.
5G Dual-mode Radios for Sprint, Courtesy of Nokia
Sprint’s Massive MIMO technology is capable of delivering up to 10 times the capacity of current LTE systems and delivering a 5G solution when it deploys the technology next year. This year, Sprint began deploying its Massive MIMO technology in several cities, including Dallas, Los Angeles, and New York where the company plans to launch mobile 5G service starting in the first half of 2019.
Next year, dual-mode radios may usher in the era of 5G wireless communications for Sprint customers. At Mobile World Congress Americas, last Spring, Nokia and Sprint demonstrated a 5G NR connection that used a dual-mode-capable radio and a massive MIMO antenna. The antenna is designed to achieve as much as 3 Gbps peak downlink throughput for a single sector over 5G and LTE simultaneously using Sprint’s radio-frequency (RF) spectrum.
Sprint’s chief technology officer, John Saw, said the company has enough (RF) spectrum to operate LTE and 5G simultaneously on the same radios. Sprint’s extensive spectrum acquisitions at FCC auctions seem to be paying off.
As Florence rapidly intensifies into a major hurricane, Verizon is well prepared to serve its customers in the southeastern U.S. with the nation’s largest and most reliable 4G LTE network should Hurricane Florence make landfall later this week.
Final fine-tuning measures are underway and local Network teams also are prepared to travel the coast to assist areas hit hardest by the storm. The efforts are part of a year-round plan to make the network strong and reliable during storms and any other circumstances.
Network enhancements in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and across the Southeast Coast since last year’s storm season include:
In addition, the company has a number of “switch” network processing centers across the southeast. With hardened shells, these facilities also feature large-scale on-site power generation, various redundant operations and technologies, and other back-up systems to ensure the company’s network remains strong, running and reliable.
Other Verizon Wireless ongoing efforts to ensure a reliable network include:
As part of Verizon’s ongoing commitment to those on the front lines of public safety, all speed caps restrictions have been lifted for first responders in North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. In addition, the Verizon Response Team (VRT) has already began providing items like mobile hotspots and phones to public safety and other support teams to make sure they can stay connected, as well pre-staging charging stations and disaster response trailers for deployment where the need will be greatest. VRT is available 24/7/365 and frequently provides assistance during disaster situations.
Kate Jay is in media relations for Verizon.
Editor’s note: This missive was written just a day before Verizon apologized and did the right thing for first responders. Nevertheless, it should not have happened in the first place. This article use Verizon as an example, to address a wider concern across the wireless space. However, the talking points are still valid.
If there was ever a reason for re-igniting net neutrality, this is it.
As an editor, one of my primary responsibilities is to view things with an unbiased, neutral eye. On the other hand, I have a fiduciary responsibility to readers to call out transgressions, indiscretions and other shameful, even illegal goings-on when I see them. This is one of those times when I am calling a company on the carpet.
As we are all, painfully, aware, Verizon throttled critical fire communications for firefighters battling California’s wildfires. For me, this is personal as well as professional. I have friends who are wildfire first responders and the fact that their, (and any) critical communications can be throttled, regardless of their plan (which is the excuse Verizon used to explain why the firefighters bandwidth was slammed) is appalling.
I have, often, written about the underhanded practices of the carrier. Similar actions are perpetrated by the content providers as well, although their services are not life-safety, as is the case with certain segments of wireless. Even after countless exposures of a variety of devious, sometimes even illegal (supported by the fines over the years) schemes, they just keep on marching to the same drummer. Yet we continue to let the wolves guard the henhouse. This latest incident is, again, proof positive that carriers cannot be trusted to watch their own chicken coop.
Congress saw that a few years ago and implemented a strong guard band that would have helped to make the carriers toe the line – Net Neutrality.
This case was not just “oops, we (Verizon) were caught in a moment and it was a typical circumstance. Investigation of the event revealed that firefighters, repeatedly, made attempts to have bandwidth restriction temporarily lifted while they were fighting the fires.
Hmmm, does Verizon’s customer service department live under a rock? Were they not aware of the gravity of the fires in California? At a minimum, this should have been escalated to the top at Verizon the moment the first contact was made. Verizon claims to have a policy in place that removes data speed restrictions when contacted in emergency situations. “This was a customer support mistake,” they said. That is the best they can come up with?
In a statement, Verizon claimed, “We made a mistake in how we communicated with our customer about the terms of its plan.” If I were one of Verizon’s top execs, I would be on my knees, begging for forgiveness and asking what Verizon could do to make up for this. It was just lucky no one died from this fiasco.
I can sympathize with the response from Santa Clara County Fire Chief Anthony Bowden, who wrote, as noted by Ars Technica. “These reduced speeds severely interfered with the OES 5262’s ability to function effectively. My Information Technology staff communicated directly with Verizon via email about the throttling, requesting it be immediately lifted for public safety purposes.”
Further, in that article, he also wrote “Verizon representatives confirmed the throttling. But rather than restoring us to an essential data transfer speed, they indicated that County Fire would have to switch to a new data plan at more than twice the cost, and they would only remove throttling after we contacted the department that handles billing and switched to the new data plan.”
Seriously? This, in the middle of the worst fire season that California has ever faced. If indeed, Verizon’s customer service told County Fire that, there should be mass firings.
I just cannot believe that this occurred. It makes an invincible argument for the restoration of Net Neutrality. Moreover, I am not alone. Attorneys general representing 22 states and the District of Columbia are asking a federal court to reinstate it – this latest incident only adding fuel to the fire.
Yet the FCC still claims Net Neutrality is not needed. Obviously, it is.
There are many other compelling arguments for its reinstatement as noted in the states’ complaint. They all point to one thing – the carriers cannot be trusted to be in full control of such a critical resource as wireless. They need a chaperone!
The most notable argument in the Attorney’s General brief, IMHO, is: “[there is] substantial record evidence showing that providers have abused … and will [continue to] abuse their gatekeeper roles in ways that harm consumers and threatens public safety.”
While I took this column to pick on Verizon, they are not the only one. In general, all providers of bandwidth share the same bed. Whether they are a carrier, ISP, wireless, wireline, or another type of MNO, they are all capable of doing something like this. They all seem to put greed first.
I rest my case!
Executive Editor/Applied Wireless Technology
His 20-plus years of editorial experience includes being the Editorial Director of Wireless Design and Development and Fiber Optic Technology, the Editor of RF Design, the Technical Editor of Communications Magazine, Cellular Business, Global Communications and a Contributing Technical Editor to Mobile Radio Technology, Satellite Communications, as well as computer-related periodicals such as Windows NT. His technical writing practice client list includes RF Industries, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Agilent Technologies, Advanced Linear Devices, Ceitec, SA, Lucent Technologies, , Qwest, City and County of Denver, Sandia National Labs, Goldman Sachs, and others. Before becoming exclusive to publishing, he was a computer consultant and regularly taught courses and seminars in applications software, hardware technology, operating systems, and electronics. His credentials include a BS, Electronic Engineering Technology; A.A.S, Electronic Digital Technology. He has held a Colorado Post-Secondary/Adult teaching credential, member of IBM’s Software Developers Assistance Program and Independent Vendor League, a Microsoft Solutions Provider Partner. He is a senior/life member of the IEEE, the Press Liaison for the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society and a member of the IEEE Communications Society, IEEE MTT Society, IEEE Vehicular Technology Society and the IEEE 5G Community. He was also a first-class FCC technician in the early days of radio.